Was the war in iraq justified there is broad agreement that removing saddam hussein from power neutralized a ruthless tyrant but the debate over why the united states went to war has grown increasingly bitter the bush administration continues vigorously to defend its case for removing saddam.
In other words, iraq was the most important target in the war on terror, and taking them out was the only way to win but the supposed threat of terrorism from iraq is not justification for launching a full-scale war in fact, the argument on its face shouldn’t have even made sense to the well-informed.
The documents all show the legality of the iraq war, and the humanitarian history of the us for iraq, coupled with the theoretical framework used for war and the documents of international law, the iraq war was justified. Zinni, who had access to the most sensitive us intelligence on iraq, was on a stage in nashville, tennessee, receiving an award from the veteran of foreign wars on august 26, 2002, when he heard the vice president launch the opening salvo in the bush administration’s campaign to generate public support for an invasion.
I will be defending the following arguments in this debate in order to prove the iraq war was justified the burden of proof is shared i must prove these arguments to be true, while my opponent must prove they are false, while presenting his own case against the war as well. Though the execution of the war was deeply flawed, there are at least five reasons it was justified, even without wmd 1 in a post-9/11 world, uncertainty about wmd is not an option.
In the days immediately following 9/11, the bush administration national security team actively debated an invasion of iraq a memo written by sec rumsfeld dated november 27, 2001 considers a us-iraq war one section of the memo questions how start, listing multiple possible justifications for a us-iraq war.